On 12/9/2013 4:30 PM, Emmanuel Florac wrote: > Le Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:21:31 +1100 vous écriviez: > Dave Chinner wrote: >> >> So, while the tech might be great, the benchmarks sucked at >> demonstrating that. It's pretty difficult to find comprehensive benchmark results, especially for niche products such as CacheCade. > And now that we have enhance-io, bcache and friends, I'm actually more > confident of using these than some sort of hidden pseudo-hardware magic. Enhance-IO is $295 per Linux server per year. Last I saw, Cleancache isn't fully supported by XFS yet in a stable vanilla release. AFAIK bcache isn't fully baked yet. Coupled with the fact that Mike seems to be limited to the CentOS ecosystem, I figured CacheCade was his best option at this time. It's been around a couple of years, works, verified decent performance, and no additional kernel software is required. And it's relatively easy to configure. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
