On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:30:10PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Equivalent to xfs_ilock_data_map_shared, except for the attribute fork.
>
> Make xfs_getbmap use it if called for the attribute fork instead of
> xfs_ilock_data_map_shared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c 2013-12-06 19:58:15.759137296 +0100
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c 2013-12-06 20:02:23.291132216 +0100
> @@ -617,22 +617,27 @@ xfs_getbmap(
> return XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
>
> xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED);
> - if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK && !(iflags & BMV_IF_DELALLOC)) {
> - if (ip->i_delayed_blks || XFS_ISIZE(ip) > ip->i_d.di_size) {
> + if (whichfork == XFS_DATA_FORK) {
> + if (!(iflags & BMV_IF_DELALLOC) &&
> + (ip->i_delayed_blks || XFS_ISIZE(ip) > ip->i_d.di_size)) {
> error = -filemap_write_and_wait(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping);
> if (error)
> goto out_unlock_iolock;
> +
> + /*
> + * Even after flushing the inode, there can still be
> + * delalloc blocks on the inode beyond EOF due to
> + * speculative reallocation. These are not removed
"speculative preallocation"
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c 2013-12-06 19:58:41.667136764 +0100
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c 2013-12-06 20:00:44.535134243 +0100
> @@ -77,17 +77,18 @@ xfs_get_extsz_hint(
> }
>
> /*
> - * This is a wrapper routine around the xfs_ilock() routine used to centralize
> - * some grungy code. It is used in places that wish to lock the inode solely
> - * for reading the extents. The reason these places can't just call
> - * xfs_ilock(SHARED) is that the inode lock also guards to bringing in of the
> - * extents from disk for a file in b-tree format. If the inode is in b-tree
> - * format, then we need to lock the inode exclusively until the extents are read
> - * in. Locking it exclusively all the time would limit our parallelism
> - * unnecessarily, though. What we do instead is check to see if the extents
> - * have been read in yet, and only lock the inode exclusively if they have not.
> + * These two are wrapper routines around the xfs_ilock() routine used to
> + * centralize some grungy code. They are used in places that wish to lock the
> + * inode solely for reading the extents. The reason these places can't just
> + * call xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) is that the inode lock also guards to
> + * bringing in of the extents from disk for a file in b-tree format. If the
> + * inode is in b-tree format, then we need to lock the inode exclusively until
> + * the extents are read in. Locking it exclusively all the time would limit
> + * our parallelism unnecessarily, though. What we do instead is check to see
> + * if the extents have been read in yet, and only lock the inode exclusively
> + * if they have not.
> *
> - * The function returns a value which should be given to the corresponding
> + * The functions return a value which should be given to the corresponding
> * xfs_iunlock() call.
> */
> uint
> @@ -101,6 +102,19 @@ xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(
> lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> xfs_ilock(ip, lock_mode);
> return lock_mode;
> +}
> +
> +uint
> +xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip)
> +{
> + uint lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
> +
> + if (ip->i_d.di_aformat == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE &&
> + (ip->i_afp->if_flags & XFS_IFEXTENTS) == 0)
> + lock_mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> + xfs_ilock(ip, lock_mode);
> + return lock_mode;
> }
Again, I think a static inline is appropriate here...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
