On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:43:54PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > IIRC last time we discussed this I expressed a preference for focussing > on the 3.2.0 release, but did not object to a 3.1.12 either. I think > Eric followed up and asked if Christoph had specific concerns that > should prompt a 3.1.12 release. Now I think it's probably just best to > focus on the xfs_repair bits for 3.2.0. My concern is pretty simple: we have a big batch of minor and not so minor fixes that I want to get out to our users. We've done releases about every 3 month for the last couple years, but we've not done any for 6 month by now. I have to admit I'm a bit out of the loop on the v5 repair work, but if Dave feels confident that he can get it done soon we should aim for a 3.2.0 release after that. If not it's more than time to get a 3.1.12 out and I'd be happy to do the work for it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
