How dangerous is dangerous?
We could offer the suggestion of a "-d" repair, if we're
in single-user mode with the root fs mounted readonly.
This change suggests -d to repair any RO mounted fs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/repair/init.c b/repair/init.c
index c3f380b..a7a7613 100644
--- a/repair/init.c
+++ b/repair/init.c
@@ -97,8 +97,17 @@ xfs_init(libxfs_init_t *args)
else
args->isreadonly = LIBXFS_EXCLUSIVELY;
- if (!libxfs_init(args))
+ if (!libxfs_init(args)) {
+ /* would -d be an option? */
+ if (!no_modify && !dangerously) {
+ args->isreadonly = (LIBXFS_ISINACTIVE |
+ LIBXFS_DANGEROUSLY);
+ if (libxfs_init(args))
+ fprintf(stderr,
+_("Unmount or use -d to repair a read-only mounted filesystem\n"));
+ }
do_error(_("couldn't initialize XFS library\n"));
+ }
ts_create();
increase_rlimit();
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
