+1, We should take the contribution of some core developers and their willingness into account, not only the benefit of some company. On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > How exactly did we decide to add a new co-maintainer? Shouldn't we have some > discussion on the list and see some substantial history of contributions? > > Best regards, > > Ric > > > > On 11/07/2013 05:08 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> >> Updated maintainer info. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Index: b/MAINTAINERS >> =================================================================== >> --- a/MAINTAINERS 2013-11-07 15:42:04.554561805 -0600 >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS 2013-11-07 15:42:59.034889770 -0600 >> @@ -9388,7 +9388,7 @@ F: drivers/xen/*swiotlb* >> XFS FILESYSTEM >> P: Silicon Graphics Inc >> M: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> >> -M: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> >> +M: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> >> M: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx >> L: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx >> W: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xfs mailing list >> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs