From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
When a node is considered for a merge with a sibling, it overwrites the
sibling pointers of the original incore nodehdr with the sibling's
pointers. This leads to loop considering the original node as a merge
candidate with itself in the second pass, and so it incorrectly
determines a merge should occur.)
Ported from equivalent kernel commit 997def25.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c b/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
index f106e06..53414f5 100644
--- a/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
+++ b/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ xfs_da3_node_toosmall(
/* start with smaller blk num */
forward = nodehdr.forw < nodehdr.back;
for (i = 0; i < 2; forward = !forward, i++) {
+ struct xfs_da3_icnode_hdr thdr;
if (forward)
blkno = nodehdr.forw;
else
@@ -1213,10 +1214,10 @@ xfs_da3_node_toosmall(
return(error);
node = bp->b_addr;
- xfs_da3_node_hdr_from_disk(&nodehdr, node);
+ xfs_da3_node_hdr_from_disk(&thdr, node);
xfs_trans_brelse(state->args->trans, bp);
- if (count - nodehdr.count >= 0)
+ if (count - thdr.count >= 0)
break; /* fits with at least 25% to spare */
}
if (i >= 2) {
--
1.8.4.rc3
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
