On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:16:14PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Test xfs/016 fails to run due to invalid mkfs options. The log size > is reported as too small according to the minimum log size > calculation: > > log size 512 blocks too small, minimum size is 853 blocks > > Update log_size to the currently specified minimum. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/xfs/016 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/016 b/tests/xfs/016 > index 2fc6af2..e52f80c 100755 > --- a/tests/xfs/016 > +++ b/tests/xfs/016 > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ _supported_os Linux > rm -f $seqres.full > > # mkfs sizes > -log_size=2097152 > +log_size=3493888 > log_size_bb=`expr $log_size / 512` That shoul dbe fine. I've been ignoring xfs/016 because the configurations I test throw this: xfs/016 21s ... [not run] Cannot mkfs for this test using MKFS_OPTIONS specified And so I haven't noticed if it was failing or not. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
