On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:41:49PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Today, if xfs_sb_read_verify encounters a v4 superblock > with junk past v4 fields which includes data in sb_crc, > it will be treated as a failing checksum and significant > corruption. > > There are known prior bugs which leave junk at the end > of the superblock; we don't need to actually fail the > verification in this case if other checks pan out ok. > > So if this is a secondary superblock, and the primary > superblock is not V5, don't treat this as a serious > checksum failure. > > We should probably check the garbage condition as > we do in xfs_repair, and possibly warn about it > or self-heal, but that's a different scope of work. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> Eric... is the one you're talking about? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
