On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:16:15PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:18:05AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Many of the vectorised function calls now take no parameters and > > return a constant value. There is no reason for these to be vectored > > functions, so convert them to constants > > > > Binary sizes: > > > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 794490 96802 1096 892388 d9de4 fs/xfs/xfs.o.orig > > 792986 96802 1096 890884 d9804 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p1 > > 792350 96802 1096 890248 d9588 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p2 > > 789293 96802 1096 887191 d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p3 > > 789005 96802 1096 886903 d8997 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p4 > > 789061 96802 1096 886959 d88af fs/xfs/xfs.o.p5 > > 789733 96802 1096 887631 d8b4f fs/xfs/xfs.o.p6 > > 791421 96802 1096 889319 d91e7 fs/xfs/xfs.o.p7 > > 791701 96802 1096 889599 d92ff fs/xfs/xfs.o.p8 > > 791205 96802 1096 889103 d91cf fs/xfs/xfs.o.p9 > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hmmm. This one doesn't seem to apply. Maybe it's just me. Applies without mismatch here on an 3.12-rc5 + oss-xfs/master tree here. What's the reject that you get? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
