On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 04:04:24PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Seems a bit clunky to do all this work when we've got to repeat most > of it when when we call xfs_setattr_size() if the size has changed. > Any thoughts on how we might reduce to a single transaction? I tried that, but the helper becomes a complete mess of flag values for the possible inode modifications. You also pointed this out the last time around. If anyone can come up with a saner helper than I tired feel free to send a patch on top. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
