There's a long comment about handling non-remountable
options in xfs_fs_remount, but nothing addresses the case
of completely bogus mount options at remount time, which
can lead to some severe strangeness:
# for I in `seq 1 10`; do mount -o remount,noacl /mnt/test2; done
# for I in `seq 1 10`; do mount -o remount,badoption /mnt/test2; done
# grep sdb4 /etc/mtab
/dev/sdb4 /mnt/test2 xfs rw,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption 0 0
This is a bit of a hack, but we can re-use xfs_parseargs()
with a dummy mount struct to just vet all of the remount
options which were passed in. With this, we get a saner
result:
[44898.102990] EXT4-fs (sdb4): Unrecognized mount option "badoption" or missing value
if we try to remount with something ridiculous.
In the long run we should probably revamp a lot of the mount option
handling...
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Note, not really sure what KM_* flag would be appropriate here,
if it fails, it really is ok, other than missing the verification.
But maybe that's too "nice?"
commit 72e6ddd901dc8a8ecb835324eb4e11b0d7ad8cf8
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Oct 11 14:03:59 2013 -0500
xfs: reject completely bogus remount options
There's a long comment about handling non-remountable
options in xfs_fs_remount, but nothing addresses the case
of completely bogus mount options at remount time, which
can lead to some severe strangeness:
# for I in `seq 1 10`; do mount -o remount,noacl /mnt/test2; done
# for I in `seq 1 10`; do mount -o remount,badoption /mnt/test2; done
# grep sdb4 /etc/mtab
/dev/sdb4 /mnt/test2 xfs rw,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,noacl,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption,badoption 0 0
This is a bit of a hack, but we can re-use xfs_parseargs()
with a dummy mount struct to just vet all of the remount
options which were passed in. With this, we get a saner
result:
[44898.102990] EXT4-fs (sdb4): Unrecognized mount option "badoption" or missing value
if we try to remount with something ridiculous.
In the long run we should probably revamp a lot of the mount option
handling...
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 15188cc..00a06d6 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -1202,11 +1202,25 @@ xfs_fs_remount(
int *flags,
char *options)
{
- struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_M(sb);
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_M(sb), *dummy_mp;
substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS];
char *p;
int error;
+ /*
+ * Check all the mount options presented to be sure
+ * there's nothing too crazy in there. Non-remountable
+ * but valid options are a different issue.
+ */
+ dummy_mp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(*dummy_mp), KM_MAYFAIL);
+ if (dummy_mp) {
+ dummy_mp->m_super = sb;
+ error = xfs_parseargs(dummy_mp, options);
+ kfree(dummy_mp);
+ if (error)
+ return -error;
+ }
+
while ((p = strsep(&options, ",")) != NULL) {
int token;
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
