This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "XFS development tree".
The branch, master has been updated
367993e xfs: dirent dtype presence is dependent on directory magic numbers
f112a04 xfs: lockdep needs to know about 3 dquot-deep nesting
from 997def25e4b9cee3b01609e18a52f926bca8bd2b (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit 367993e7c6428cb7617ab7653d61dca54e2fdede
Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Sep 30 09:37:04 2013 +1000
xfs: dirent dtype presence is dependent on directory magic numbers
The determination of whether a directory entry contains a dtype
field originally was dependent on the filesystem having CRCs
enabled. This meant that the format for dtype beign enabled could be
determined by checking the directory block magic number rather than
doing a feature bit check. This was useful in that it meant that we
didn't need to pass a struct xfs_mount around to functions that
were already supplied with a directory block header.
Unfortunately, the introduction of dtype fields into the v4
structure via a feature bit meant this "use the directory block
magic number" method of discriminating the dirent entry sizes is
broken. Hence we need to convert the places that use magic number
checks to use feature bit checks so that they work correctly and not
by chance.
The current code works on v4 filesystems only because the dirent
size roundup covers the extra byte needed by the dtype field in the
places where this problem occurs.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
commit f112a049712a5c07de25d511c3c6587a2b1a015e
Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Sep 30 09:37:03 2013 +1000
xfs: lockdep needs to know about 3 dquot-deep nesting
Michael Semon reported that xfs/299 generated this lockdep warning:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.12.0-rc2+ #2 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
touch/21072 is trying to acquire lock:
(&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
but task is already holding lock:
(&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&xfs_dquot_other_class);
lock(&xfs_dquot_other_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by touch/21072:
#0: (sb_writers#10){++++.+}, at: [<c11185b6>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e
#1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#4){+.+.+.}, at: [<c11078ee>] do_last+0x245/0xe40
#2: (sb_internal#2){++++.+}, at: [<c122c9e0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x1f/0x35
#3: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock/1){+.+...}, at: [<c126cd1b>] xfs_ilock+0x100/0x1f1
#4: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){++++-.}, at: [<c126cf52>] xfs_ilock_nowait+0x105/0x22f
#5: (&dqp->q_qlock){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
#6: (&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
The lockdep annotation for dquot lock nesting only understands
locking for user and "other" dquots, not user, group and quota
dquots. Fix the annotations to match the locking heirarchy we now
have.
Reported-by: Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c | 6 +++---
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_format.h | 51 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_readdir.c | 4 ++--
fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c | 6 +++---
fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---
5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
XFS development tree
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
