From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Michael Semon reported that xfs/299 generated this lockdep warning:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.12.0-rc2+ #2 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
touch/21072 is trying to acquire lock:
(&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
but task is already holding lock:
(&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&xfs_dquot_other_class);
lock(&xfs_dquot_other_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by touch/21072:
#0: (sb_writers#10){++++.+}, at: [<c11185b6>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e
#1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#4){+.+.+.}, at: [<c11078ee>] do_last+0x245/0xe40
#2: (sb_internal#2){++++.+}, at: [<c122c9e0>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x1f/0x35
#3: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock/1){+.+...}, at: [<c126cd1b>] xfs_ilock+0x100/0x1f1
#4: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){++++-.}, at: [<c126cf52>] xfs_ilock_nowait+0x105/0x22f
#5: (&dqp->q_qlock){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
#6: (&xfs_dquot_other_class){+.+...}, at: [<c12902fb>] xfs_trans_dqlockedjoin+0x57/0x64
The lockdep annotation for dquot lock nesting only understands
locking for user and "other" dquots, not user, group and quota
dquots. Fix the annotations to match the locking heirarchy we now
have.
Reported-by: Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
index 71520e6..1ee776d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ int xfs_dqerror_mod = 33;
struct kmem_zone *xfs_qm_dqtrxzone;
static struct kmem_zone *xfs_qm_dqzone;
-static struct lock_class_key xfs_dquot_other_class;
+static struct lock_class_key xfs_dquot_group_class;
+static struct lock_class_key xfs_dquot_project_class;
/*
* This is called to free all the memory associated with a dquot
@@ -703,8 +704,20 @@ xfs_qm_dqread(
* Make sure group quotas have a different lock class than user
* quotas.
*/
- if (!(type & XFS_DQ_USER))
- lockdep_set_class(&dqp->q_qlock, &xfs_dquot_other_class);
+ switch (type) {
+ case XFS_DQ_USER:
+ /* uses the default lock class */
+ break;
+ case XFS_DQ_GROUP:
+ lockdep_set_class(&dqp->q_qlock, &xfs_dquot_group_class);
+ break;
+ case XFS_DQ_PROJ:
+ lockdep_set_class(&dqp->q_qlock, &xfs_dquot_project_class);
+ break;
+ default:
+ ASSERT(0);
+ break;
+ }
XFS_STATS_INC(xs_qm_dquot);
--
1.8.3.2
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
