Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/015 regression test for prealloc with balance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:27:33 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We had a regression where we were not copying csums properly when balancing a
> prealloc extent.  Unfortunately the way this showed up the most was with the
> csum simply missing, which doesn't result in an error to userspace.  So I've
> copied what generic/310 does and check dmesg for csum errors when the test
> starts and then compare that count to the csum errors after the test finishes to
> see if there was a problem.  This approach caught the error without my fix, and
> then passed fine with my fix in place but with the previous errors still in
> dmesg.  Thanks,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/015     | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/015.out |  2 ++
>  tests/btrfs/group   |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/015.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015 b/tests/btrfs/015
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d463e48
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/015
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/015
> +#
> +# Regression test for balance with prealloc extents.  This checks to make sure
> +# we are balacing prealloc'ed extents properly by making sure we don't have any
> +# csum errors.  Unfortunately this manifests itself with no csum which means
> +# userspace doesn't get an error when reading the file back so we have to grok
> +# dmesg to see if there was a csum error.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2013 Fusion IO.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +nr_csum_no_found=$(dmesg | grep -c "no csum found")
> +nr_csum_failed=$(dmesg | grep -c "csum failed")
> +
> +_check_csum_error()
> +{
> +	new_csum_no_found=$(dmesg | grep -c "no csum found")
> +	new_csum_failed=$(dmesg | grep -c "csum failed")
> +
> +	if [ $nr_csum_no_found -eq $new_csum_no_found -a \
> +	     $nr_csum_failed -eq $new_csum_failed ]; then
> +		return 0
> +	fi
> +	return 1
> +}
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "falloc 0 1M" -c "pwrite 16k 8k" -c "fsync" \
> +	$SCRATCH_MNT/foo > $seqres.full 2>&1
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG fi ba $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \
> +	_fail "balance failed"
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mount
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pread 0 1M" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || \
> +	_fail "pread failed"
> +
> +# This sucks but unfortunately it is the only way to be sure something didn't go
> +# wrong.
> +_check_csum_error || _fail "csum detected, please check dmesg"
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0 ; exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/015.out b/tests/btrfs/015.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..fee0fcf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/015.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 015
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 3a5747f..dc5bbea 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@
>  012 auto quick
>  013 auto quick
>  014 auto quick
> +015 auto quick
> 

Nothing to complain about.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux