On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 11:51 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way > that we can easily add subsystems. > > To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs > and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling > it. Maybe adding a mechanism to MAINTAINERS would be better. Maybe a default B: (backport?) of stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a per-subsystem override? SUBSYSTEM TYPE M: maintainer@email.address L: list@email.address S: Supported F: file/pattern/ B: stable@email.address _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
