On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:48:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > We were actually testing this improperly, there was a bug in the set default > code so we weren't actually honoring the 0 subvolid properly. To fix this we > need to get the subvolid for the subvol we want to set as the default and use > that in the command. With this patch we now pass again with the fix for the 0 > subvolid. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
