On 09/12/13 16:00, Eric Sandeen wrote:
The test as it stands allows level == XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH (5),
but a max depth of 5 equates to level values of 0 through 4.
Level 5 would be a depth of 6.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen<sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/db/check.c b/db/check.c
index cbe55ba..d9e3e3f 100644
--- a/db/check.c
+++ b/db/check.c
@@ -3138,7 +3138,7 @@ process_leaf_node_dir_v2_int(
case XFS_DA_NODE_MAGIC:
node = iocur_top->data;
xfs_da3_node_hdr_from_disk(&nodehdr, node);
- if (nodehdr.level< 1 || nodehdr.level> XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH) {
+ if (nodehdr.level< 1 || nodehdr.level>= XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH) {
if (!sflag || v)
dbprintf(_("bad node block level %d for dir ino "
"%lld block %d\n"),
I think the current code is correct.
0 is a leaf. levels 1-XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH are nodes.
Subtract 1 when used as an index.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
