On 09/18/13 11:36, Michael L. Semon wrote:
Looks good. I tried it on an 11-GB partition with an unpatched git kernel
3.12.0 + xfs-oss/master, coupled with the latest git xfsprogs. It took a
reasonable amount of time, relatively speaking. It put forth the error I was
expecting, and a new 32-bit core is available upon your request but not
uploaded yet.
As for the assert itself, according to kgdb, these are the first, last, and
BBTOB(bp->b_length) numbers for this run:
1544 4591 4096
Good work!
Michael
Thanks for the feedback.
last > BBTOB(bp->b_length) was also true for the longer version of the
test. The only difference is that it happens earlier in the remove.
I take a closer look at the code.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
