On 9/12/13 4:54 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 09/12/13 16:17, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> With all of the changes for CRC filesystems in xfsprogs git now, I'm wondering if it'd be a good idea to do a "3.2.0-alpha1" sort of release. >> >> I know it's not yet feature complete, but I think there would be value in getting a version-stamped tarball out there for testing - it could filter to rawhide-ish distros, and get a bit more airtime while the remaining bits get worked out. >> >> We'd probably want a nice readme about what's new and what's not yet done, caveats, etc, but I think it'd be worth getting it out there into the hands of willing testers, w/o requiring them to do a build from git. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> -Eric >> > > Good idea, but xfsprogs is in a state that it can't compile: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-09/msg00396.html > > Patch 31 v3 / 55 is broken. It is missing xfs_sb.c and has an extra > xfs_mount.c. > > If you want it this week, we could do the corrections or wait for Dave > to repost. hm? The git tree builds fine here, anyway (modulo some warnings). so quick, cut an alpha1 before it breaks. ;) (but if you mean: we should get the latest stuff on the list in first, and fix it so it builds - ok - but there will probably always be more stuff to pull in, so at some point when we have a reasonable amount of it in place, we could cut a test release? There's always "alpha2"...) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
