In traverse_int_dir2block(), the variable 'i' is the level in the tree, with 0 being a leaf node. In the "do" loop we start at the root, and work our way down to a leaf. If the first node we read is an interior node with NODE_MAGIC, but it tells us that its level is 0 (a leaf), this is clearly an inconsistency. Worse, we'd return with success, bno set, and only level[0] in the cursor initialized. Then down this path we'll segfault when accessing an uninitialized (and zeroed) member of the cursor's level array: process_node_dir2 traverse_int_dir2block // returns 0 w/ bno set, only level[0] init'd process_leaf_level_dir2 verify_dir2_path(mp, da_cursor, 0) // p_level == 0 this_level = p_level + 1; node = cursor->level[this_level].bp->b_addr; // level[1] uninit & 0'd Fix this by recognizing that an interior node w/ level 0 is invalid, and error out as for other inconsistencies. By the time the level 0 test is done, we have already ensured that this block has XFS_DA[3]_NODE_MAGIC. Reported-by: Jan Yves Brueckner <jyb@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- V3: Simplify the test. Mark, Dave, I know you had some concerns about other conditions being tested, but I think those are separate from this fix, which simply ensures that the level we find for this _NODE block is within the valid range for a node. (It also matches the test currently present in xfs_check). If we've got other missing conditions, those can be other patches, I think. V2: Drop re-test of hdr magic which is guaranteed to be NODE at this point. fix "interior inode" - s/b "interior node" My only testcase for this is Jan Yves Brueckner's badly corrupted filesystem image. With this change, we get i.e. : bad level in interior inode for directory inode 39869938 corrupt block 6 in directory inode 39869957 will junk block diff --git a/repair/dir2.c b/repair/dir2.c index 05bd4b7..e82ca7d 100644 --- a/repair/dir2.c +++ b/repair/dir2.c @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ _("bad record count in inode %" PRIu64 ", count = %d, max = %d\n"), */ if (i == -1) { i = da_cursor->active = nodehdr.level; - if (i >= XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH) { + if (i < 1 || i >= XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH) { do_warn( _("bad header depth for directory inode %" PRIu64 "\n"), da_cursor->ino); _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs