On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:36:18PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 8/15/13 1:15 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > When xfs_growfs_data_private() is updating backup superblocks, > > it bails out on the first error encountered, whether reading or > > writing: > > Any thoughts on this one? W/ the verifiers, we have a higher > chance of encountering an error, and leaving the rest of the > supers un-updated. Repair will then possibly revert the fs to > it's pre-growfs state, and data loss will ensue... Sorry, I must have missed this. I remember discussing it with you. The change looks fine to me, but I haven't tested it at all. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
