On 09/04/2013 08:59 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:25:01PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: >> Update inode allocation transaction reservations for the finobt. A >> create via record modification requires a log reservation for the >> additional finobt record. Any such allocation could result in an >> finobt removal if the inode chunk has become fully allocated, thus >> we include a reservation for a finobt btree merge as well. >> Allocation of a new inode chunk must account for splits in the >> finobt as well as the existing ialloc tree. > > These transaction reservation changes are only necessary for > filesystems with free inode btrees, otherwise they just use more log > space than is necessary. > Yeah, good point. > Can you add helper functions for the free inode btree reservations, > and have them return 0 when the feature is not enabled? That way the > code stays pretty clean, is self documenting and doesn't take > unnecessary space when the feature is not enabled.... > So not new functions that duplicate the entire calculations for the finobt enabled cases, but new functions that define the additional requirements for the finobt on top of the existing reservation calculations for particular operations (i.e., similar to the recent patch to fix the inode log size, if I recall). Sounds good. Brian >> Also update XFS_IALLOC_SPACE_RES() to reserve data blocks for >> finobt split/merge scenarios. > > Needs to handle the enabled/disabled case, too. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
