On Aug 29, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, what dm-thinp is trying to tell us is that the minimum > *physical* IO size is 512 bytes (i.e. /sys/.../physical_block_size) > but the efficient IO size is 256k. So dm-thinp is exposing the > information incorrectly. What it shoul dbe doing is setting both the > minimum_io_size and the optimal_io_size to the same value of 256k… Should I file a bug? Against lvm2? Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
