Re: [PATCH] Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/13 16:19, Mark Tinguely wrote:
On 08/26/13 16:04, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:00:24AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
On 08/26/13 08:36, Brian Foster wrote:
On 08/26/2013 12:13 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:28:00PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
Hi all,

I hit an assert on a debug kernel while beating on some finobt
work and
eventually reproduced it on unmodified/TOT xfs/xfsprogs as of
today. I
hit it through a couple different paths, first while running
fsstress on
a CRC enabled filesystem (with otherwise default mkfs options):

(These tests are running on a 4p, 4GB VM against a 100GB virtio disk,
hosted on a single spindle desktop box).

crc=1
fsstress -z -fsymlink=1 -n99999999 -p4 -d /mnt/test

XFS: Assertion failed: first<= last&& last< BBTOB(bp->b_length),

Directory buffer overrun.

A full test still asserts on the remove with the patched Linux 3.10 - I
am about 50% into the retest of Linux 3.10 and then I was planning to
move back to Linux 3.9.

kdump did not work, so I have no vmcore and therefore no productive
information.


Confirmed the Linux 3.10 asserts. Linux 3.9 does not assert.

I will fix the kdump and try to catch a Linux 3.10 assert.

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux