On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/11/13 22:14, zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c >> index 85e9f87..4ad8fee 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c >> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_search( >> * extent. If the overlap covers the beginning, the end, or all of the >> busy >> * extent, the overlapping portion can be made unbusy and used for the >> * allocation. We can't split a busy extent because we can't modify a >> - * transaction/CIL context busy list, but we can update an entries block >> + * transaction/CIL context busy list, but we can update an entrie's block > > > ^^^^^^ > changed that to entry's Good catch, thanks. > >> * number or length. >> * >> * Returns true if the extent can safely be reused, or false if the >> search > > -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
