On 08/15/2013 07:25 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:27:56PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: >> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> At xfs_ail_min(), we do check if the AIL list is empty or not before >> returning the first item in it with list_empty() and list_first_entry(). >> >> This can be simplified a bit with a new list operation routine that is >> the list_first_entry_or_null() which has been introduced by: >> >> commit 6d7581e62f8be462440d7b22c6361f7c9fa4902b >> list: introduce list_first_entry_or_null >> >> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c >> index 0eda725..e91d160 100644 >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c >> @@ -68,10 +68,7 @@ xfs_log_item_t * >> xfs_ail_min( >> struct xfs_ail *ailp) >> { >> - if (list_empty(&ailp->xa_ail)) >> - return NULL; >> - >> - return list_first_entry(&ailp->xa_ail, xfs_log_item_t, li_ail); >> + return list_first_entry_or_null(&ailp->xa_ail, xfs_log_item_t, li_ail); >> } > > At this point, it can become a static inline function in > xfs_trans_priv.h. And while you are touching this, remove the > typedef... Ok, I'll take care of that. Thanks, -Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs