> And FWIW, it's no secret that XFS has more per-operation overhead > than ext4 through the write path when it comes to allocation, so > it's no surprise that on a workload that is highly dependent on > allocation overhead that ext4 is a bit faster.... This cannot explain a worse scaling curve though? w-i-s is all about scaling. -Andi _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
