On 8/14/13 1:20 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hence looks like we'll need some new xfs_repair functionality to fix > this. It might take me a little while to get you a fix - perhaps > someone else with a little bit of spare time could get it done > sooner than I can. Anyone? Pff, not like I have the time, but it also looks pretty trivial. secondary_sb_wack() only conditionally checks & zeroes unused space; making it unconditional is probably all it takes. I think it also needs to _not_ zero sb_bad_features2 as it does today, because that is supposed to be kept in sync w/ sb_features2. I have a patch I'll test; it'd be great to get a metadump from Michael to test it on his original failure case. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
