On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:13:52PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> XXX Maybe I missed some more...
>
> ---
> libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: b/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c 2013-08-06 11:25:54.400817879 -0500
> +++ b/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c 2013-08-06 11:26:32.420897946 -0500
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ xfs_ialloc_inode_init(
> * individual transactions causing a lot of log traffic.
> */
> fbuf->b_ops = &xfs_inode_buf_ops;
> - xfs_buf_zero(fbuf, 0, ninodes << mp->m_sb.sb_inodelog);
> + xfs_buf_zero(fbuf, 0, BBTOB(fbuf->b_length));
> for (i = 0; i < ninodes; i++) {
> int ioffset = i << mp->m_sb.sb_inodelog;
> uint isize = xfs_dinode_size(version);
It's fixed in the second series of patches, along with all the other
little differences between the kernel and userspace. There's no
point in trying to fix them one by one here, because untill it's
easy to diff the files with the kernel code these sorts of issues
will be easily missed.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
