On 07/19/13 01:44, Dave Chinner wrote:
From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c index bdce1b3..222f08c 100644 --- a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c +++ b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c
9th chunk in libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c patch
@@ -1795,9 +1793,9 @@ xfs_dir2_node_addname_int( /* * Look at the current free entry. Is it good enough? * - * The bests initialisation should be wher eteh bufer is read in + * The bests initialisation should be where the bufer is read in * the above branch. But gcc is too stupid to realise that bests - * iand the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed + * and the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed * there, so we have to do it here to avoid warnings. Blech. */ bests = xfs_dir3_free_bests_p(mp, free);
A clean up in the xfsprogs master branch requires this to be removed. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
