On 8/8/13 9:05 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> Could we get a little info for the xfs_io man page?
>
Yup, otherwise xfs/293 fails :)
# ./check xfs/293
FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug)
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 bp-05 3.11.0-rc1+
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sdb2
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch
xfs/293 10s ... - output mismatch (see /mnt/test2/git/xfstests/results/xfs/293.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/293.out 2013-03-27 12:57:49.318520102 -0500
+++ /mnt/test2/git/xfstests/results/xfs/293.out.bad 2013-08-08 15:38:30.881221070 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
QA output created by 293
Silence is golden
+readdir not documented in the xfs_io manpage
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/293.out /mnt/test2/git/xfstests/results/xfs/293.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: xfs/293
Failures: xfs/293
Failed 1 of 1 tests
/me pats self on back ;)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
