On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:24:54PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > When CRCs are enabled, there may be multiple allocations made if the > headers cause a length overflow. This, however, does not mean that > the number of headers required increases, as the second and > subsequent extents may be contiguous with the previous extent. Hence > when we map the extents to write the attribute data, we may end up > with less extents than allocations made. Hence the assertion that we > consume th enumber of headers we calculated in the allocation loop > is incorrect and needs to be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Goes with commit 90253cf142469a40f89f989904abf0a1e500e1a6 Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs