On 7/29/13 12:31 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Honest question: does one more sync make this deterministic, or is it a best-effort, um, hack? I'm not quite sure why even 1 sync is needed. :( I'm not sure what bug this is trying to test; if you need 2 syncs for global space stats to accurately reflect the fact that you chopped off the end of a block, maybe that's ... still a bug? Or if it's just the big-hammer question of "does the truncated space *ever* get freed?" then maybe umount/remount/check would tell you that more definitively. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
