Le 03.07.2013 11:24, Dave Chinner a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:14:41AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
Le 03.07.2013 08:40, Dave Chinner a écrit :
>On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
>>This patch changes type of xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>The output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is
>>modified to report xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx as a list:
>
>What's the problem with that? All XFS patches and problem
>reports should be sent to the xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list. There are far
>more people than just the maintainer that can triage problems,
>answer questions and review patches...
>
It was just disturbing: I was looking for a list for XFS
and found only maintainers.
That's what the:
L: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
entry is, yes?
In the output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl:
Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)
[If having the mailing list listed as the maintainer/supporter is
correct,
could ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl also report the mailing list as a
list ?]
Regards.
--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
