On 06/27/2013 09:57 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
If you use the SCRATCH_DEV_POOL for btrfs you will end up with the command line
like this
mkfs.btrfs $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL $SCRATCH_DEV
and btrfs does this thing where it makes the lowest valued device id show up in
/proc/mounts no matter which device you specify at the mount command. So in
this case mount will show the first device in $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL instead of
$SCRATCH_DEV,
The first item in the SCRATCH_DEV_POOL is assigned to SCRATCH_DEV.
The remaining will be used where more than one disk is needed.
so anybody who wants to just use the scratch mnt with the scratch
dev will fail to work because we never unmount the scratch mount.
Fix this by
checking to see if the scratch dev pool is mounted at scratch mnt and unmount it
so we can run our test. Also fix scratch_unmount to call umount $SCRATCH_MNT
instead of unmount $SCRATCH_DEV so it doesn't screw up with tests that use
$SCRATCH_DEV_POOL. This fixes the issue I was seeing by running
./check btrfs/307 generic/015
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
common/rc | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
index ad7cbc9..6e3ad65 100644
--- a/common/rc
+++ b/common/rc
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ _scratch_mount()
_scratch_unmount()
{
- $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_DEV
+ $UMOUNT_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
}
This will fix the above problem for the reason mentioned.
_scratch_remount()
@@ -938,6 +938,8 @@ _supported_os()
#
_require_scratch()
{
+ local i
+
case "$FSTYP" in
nfs*)
echo $SCRATCH_DEV | grep -q ":" > /dev/null 2>&1
@@ -978,6 +980,21 @@ _require_scratch()
exit 1
fi
fi
+
+ # we may have a scratch dev pool specified, so make sure it's been unmounted
+ # from the scratch mount
+ for i in $SCRATCH_DEV_POOL; do
+ if _mount | grep -q $i; then
+ if ! _mount | grep $i | grep -q $SCRATCH_MNT; then
+ echo "\$SCRATCH_DEV_POOL is mounted but not on \$SCRATCH_MNT - aborting"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+ if ! $UMOUNT_PROG $i; then
+ echo "failed to umount $i - aborting"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+ fi
+ done
}
This looks some additional checks beyond the fix for above problem.
Or did I miss something ? Further _is_mounted() can be used here.
Thanks
Anand
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
