On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:51:41PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/27/12 3:40 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > xfs_swap_extents_check_format() contains checks to make sure that > > original and the temporary files during defrag are compatible; > > Gabriel VLASIU ran into a case where xfs_fsr returned EINVAL > > because the tests found the btree root to be of size 120, > > while the fork offset was only 104; IOW, they overlapped. > > > > However, this is just due to an error in the > > xfs_swap_extents_check_format() tests, because it is checking > > the in-memory btree root size against the on-disk fork offset. > > We should be checking the on-disk sizes in both cases. > > > > This patch adds a new macro to calculate this size, and uses > > it in the tests. > > > > With this change, the filesystem image provided by Gabriel > > allows for proper file degragmentation. > > I think this and the followup patch 2/1 got lost. > > Ben, any idea? Yeah. Sorry Eric. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
