On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/9/13 10:03 PM, Eryu Guan wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > ... > > > index 53af708..4c3e2f4 100644 > > --- a/tests/ext4/group > > +++ b/tests/ext4/group > > @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ > > 303 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress > > 304 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress > > 305 auto > > +306 dangerous rw resize quick > > > > > > I'm wondering why it's not in auto group :) > > > because I forgot about auto! :) > > But it's also somewhat dangerous; it could oops or hang, so perhaps > auto is not a good idea. If the bug has already been fixed, then auto rather than dangerous should be used. If the hang/panic cannot be fixed, or is going to take some time to be fixed, that's when dangerous should be used. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
