On 05/07/13 14:07, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:04:05PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 05/07/13 08:37, Dave Jones wrote:
> > 172.233570] Bytes b4 ffff8800aaac4e28: 07 a2 fd ff 00 00 00 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ........ZZZZZZZZ
> > [ 172.233573] Object ffff8800aaac4e38: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233575] Object ffff8800aaac4e48: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233577] Object ffff8800aaac4e58: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233579] Object ffff8800aaac4e68: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233581] Object ffff8800aaac4e78: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233583] Object ffff8800aaac4e88: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233586] Object ffff8800aaac4e98: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> > [ 172.233588] Object ffff8800aaac4ea8: 6a 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b jkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> ^^
>
> xfs_efi_log_item.efi_refcount being decremented on the xfs_efi_release()
> CAI Qian had the same thing in his May 6 "3.9.0: XFS rootfs corruption"
> email.
>
> I have not reproduced it yet.
I've hit it on two different machines today. The good news is that the
corruption never makes it onto disk. xfs_repair doesn't pick up anything.
Dave
There was a new patch in the efi/efd code that must be misbehaving.
You are correct, this is not an on-disk value.
I now have poisoning on and I can see this doing a compile like you
suggested. I will ASSERT to see who is doing the decrement after free.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs