On 05/02/2013 11:09 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 05/02/13 06:23, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> v2->v1:
>> Fix a typo at comments, i.e. s/xfs_krash/xfs_chash/.
>>
>>
>> From: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Remove struct xfs_chash from struct xfs_mount as there is no user of
>> it nowadays.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu<jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
>> index bc90706..b68e56b 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
>> @@ -192,8 +192,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
>> xfs_dablk_t m_dirleafblk; /* blockno of dir non-data v2 */
>> xfs_dablk_t m_dirfreeblk; /* blockno of dirfreeindex v2 */
>> uint m_chsize; /* size of next field */
>> - struct xfs_chash *m_chash; /* fs private inode per-cluster
>> - * hash table */
>> atomic_t m_active_trans; /* number trans frozen */
>> #ifdef HAVE_PERCPU_SB
>> xfs_icsb_cnts_t __percpu *m_sb_cnts; /* per-cpu superblock counters */
>
> Your mailer may have damaged the patch. The <TAB> are now spaces.
>
> FYI, I had problems with another patch of yours:
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00022.html
> starting at the line:
> @@ -630,6 +688,12 @@ xfs_log_mount(
>
> I think that this patch can be fixed rather resent. Looks good.
Not sure why my email client did a bad formating, will take care of it anyway.
Thanks,
-Jeff
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
