On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 02:22:08AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > All the patches look good to me, > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > But I think at least patch 1, maybe 2 and 3 aswell should be submitted > for the pending release. If the SGI guys want to take them, I'm happy for that to occur. As it is, I've got another bug fix to xfs_logprint (fixes xfs/295) and I found a significant xfs-db regression as a result of the dirv1 removal. I'll post the fixes as delta patches ot this tarball, but like the patch 9/8, the dirv1 fix should probably be rolled back into the original patch... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
