On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 03:13:59PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > This test sets up a dm flakey target and then runs my fsync tester I've been > using to verify btrfs's fsync() is working properly. It will create a dm flakey > device, mount it, run my test, make the flakey device start dropping writes, and > then unmount the fs. Then we mount it back up and make sure the md5sums match > and then run fsck on the device to make sure we got a consistent fs. I used the > output from a run on BTRFS since it's the only one that passes this test > properly. I verified each test manually to make sure they were in fact valid > files. XFS and Ext4 both fail this test in one way or another. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > V2->V3: > -encorporate all of Dave Chinners feedback > -expand the testing to run the tests with normal dmsetup suspend and with > --nolockfs I haven't tested the new version yet, but all the changes I asked for look good now. Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
