Hey Eric,
Couple of comments.
1. The OPTIONS are listed in several ways, (alphabetical order, same
order as they appear in the SYNOPSIS, ...). I don't really have a
preference, but as long as we are cleaning up the manpages, I suggest we
be consistent. (case insensitive alpha order maybe???)
2. How about making the -V option wording the same also?
xfs_db and xfs_repair are:
Prints out the current version number and exits.
^^^^^^^^
The others:
man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_admin.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_bmap.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_check.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_copy.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_growfs.8:Prints the version number and exits. The
man/man8/xfs_io.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_logprint.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_mkfile.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_ncheck.8:Prints the version number and exits.
man/man8/xfs_rtcp.8:Prints the version number and exits.
3. The following are missing the -V option in both the SYNOPSIS and
OPTIONS sections.
(I did verify the -V option works for all commands)
man/man8/xfs_estimate.8
man/man8/xfs_freeze.8
man/man8/xfs_fsr.8
man/man8/xfs_mdrestore.8
man/man8/xfs_metadump.8
man/man8/xfs_quota.8
man/man8/xfs_repair.8
4. The -V prints the version and exits, shouldn't all the SYNOPSIS look
like this for the -V option?
SYNOPSIS
xfs_db [ -c cmd ] ... [ -i|r|x|F ] [ -f ] [ -l logdev ] ...
xfs_db -V
Regards
--Rich
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
