On 04/23/2013 02:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
...
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> index cd29f61..d3e0679 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_trans {
> int64_t t_res_fdblocks_delta; /* on-disk only chg */
> int64_t t_frextents_delta;/* superblock freextents chg*/
> int64_t t_res_frextents_delta; /* on-disk only chg */
> -#ifdef DEBUG
> +#if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> int64_t t_ag_freeblks_delta; /* debugging counter */
> int64_t t_ag_flist_delta; /* debugging counter */
> int64_t t_ag_btree_delta; /* debugging counter */
>
I see some ASSERT() calls using these counters but the macros that
manage them appear to be defined against DEBUG only (further down in
xfs_trans.h). This looks like it would lead to spurious warnings..?
Brian
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
