On 4/15/13 8:45 AM, 符永涛 wrote: > And at the same time we got the following error log of glusterfs: > [2013-04-15 20:43:03.851163] I [dht-rebalance.c:1611:gf_defrag_status_get] 0-glusterfs: Rebalance is completed > [2013-04-15 20:43:03.851248] I [dht-rebalance.c:1614:gf_defrag_status_get] 0-glusterfs: Files migrated: 1629, size: 1582329065954, lookups: 11036, failures: 561 > [2013-04-15 20:43:03.887634] W [glusterfsd.c:831:cleanup_and_exit] (-->/lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d) [0x3bd16e767d] (-->/lib64/libpthread.so.0() [0x3bd1a07851] (-->/usr/sbin/glusterfs(glusterfs_sigwaiter+0xdd) [0x405c9d]))) 0-: received signum (15), shutting down > [2013-04-15 20:43:03.887878] E [rpcsvc.c:1155:rpcsvc_program_unregister_portmap] 0-rpc-service: Could not unregister with portmap > We'll take a look, thanks. Going forward, could I ask that you take a few minutes to batch up the information, rather than sending several emails in a row? It makes it much harder to collect the information when it's spread across so many emails. Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
