On 03/27/2013 08:46 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:23:07AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
All xfstest developers,
Thanks again for all your time in submitting and reviewing patches
for xfstests. The latest patchset posted here:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00467.html
requires all current patches to be re-factored.
Given that we are now segregating patches into subdirectories, is it
correct in the future tests should be named descriptively, instead of
using 3 digit NNN numbers (which has been a major pain from a central
assignment perspective)?
Yes
If so, is there a suggested naming convention that is being recommended?
Thanks for getting this change merged in!!
- Ted
I suggest:
1. They should also be descriptive of the test rather than a number.
2. All lowercase letters separated by _
i.e.
something like
tests/$FSTYP/break_my_filesystem
Thanks
--Rich
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
