Re: [PATCH v2] Count journal size in test 289

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/20/2013 09:31 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 3/20/13 5:50 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
Test 289 ignored the fact that historically journal is not accounted as
fs overhead in ext3. For larger filesystems it is hidden in 1% tolerance
but for filesystems smaller than 12G the test fails. So make the
counting precise to work everywhere.

CC: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

Looks fine, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>


p.s. - sorry, didn't catch this the first time:

_filter_size_to_bytes won't work for lowercase units, which might
be nice.  How about:

+	case $suffix in
+		k|K) mul=1024 ;;
+		m|M) mul=$((1024*1024)) ;;
+		g|G) mul=$((1024*1024*1024)) ;;
+		t|T) mul=$((1024*1024*1024*1024)) ;;
+	esac

SGI guys - maybe could do that as a small fix-up on commit.  Otherwise, if anyone
ever needs lower case they could just add it at the same time, so no big deal.

Will do thanks for the review.

--Rich


-Eric


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux