On 3/13/13 1:56 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > It's a little odd that you get: > > Feb 12 19:47:18 ip-100-0-100-1 kernel: [2541168.014259] XFS (md0): xfs_iunlink_remove: xfs_itobp() returned error 117. > > because AFAIK, 117 is not any known error number (not even xfs's old EFSCORRUPTED value, which was 990) > But I see other references in various places to this error number coming from XFS - so I'm not sure. Ugh, no it's not odd, it's: #define EUCLEAN 117 which maps to EFSCORRUPTED. Sorry for that noise, how'd I miss that? :( Anyway, turn up the error level & see if you get more info. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
