> > Ok, see, this is odd part here. The OP didn't seem to have this > metadata corruption issue with the old 2.6.18 kernel, at least I think > that's the one he mentioned. Then he switched to 2.6.35. IIRC there > were a number of commits around that time and some regressions. I also > recall 2.6.35 is not a long term stable kernel. I'd guess there were > reasons for that. So, I'm wondering if there was a bug/regression > relating to XFS metadata in 2.6.35 corrected in .36 or later and simply > not backported. Seems to ring a bell, vaguely. I have no idea > where/how to search for such information. > That is the main reason I asked. I google for regression / issue with XFS in 2.6.35 but I didn't find anything. My hope was that someone from this mailing list would remember it (if such a regression did exist of course). _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
