Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> You need the XFS patch I posted so that readahead buffer
> verification is avoided in the case of an error being returned from
> the readahead.
I apologize if I was not clear in my previous post. I mean to say that
returning -EIO from dm, even in conjunction with your patch, is not
sufficient to fix the problem.
Specifically, I repeated the experiment with v3.8.2 patched as discussed
below, running my original script (repeated here for completeness):
pvcreate /dev/vd[bc]
vgcreate test /dev/vd[bc]
lvcreate -L 8G -n vol test /dev/vdb
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/mapper/test-vol
mount -o noatime /dev/mapper/test-vol /mnt
cd /mnt
git clone ~/linux-stable
cd /
umount /mnt
mount -o noatime /dev/mapper/test-vol /mnt
pvmove -b /dev/vdb /dev/vdc
sleep 2
rm -rf /mnt/linux-stable
I obtained a string of errors that starts with this:
[ 166.596574] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x805060 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8
[ 166.599556] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x805060 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8
[ 166.604845] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x5285b8 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8
[ 166.607894] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x5285b8 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8
[ 166.614242] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x54f2b0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8
[ 166.617307] XFS (dm-1): metadata I/O error: block 0x54f2b0 ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 5 numblks 8
[ 166.651373] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 166.653517] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 166.655545] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 166.657614] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 166.659685] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 166.661731] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
[ 166.663761] XFS (dm-1): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
I used v3.8.2 with the following diff, including both your xfs patch
and my attempt to patch dm-raid1 to return EIO:
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
index fa51918..88903e3 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
@@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@ static int mirror_map(struct dm_target *ti, struct bio *bio)
*/
if (!r || (r == -EWOULDBLOCK)) {
if (rw == READA)
- return -EWOULDBLOCK;
+ return -EIO;
queue_bio(ms, bio, rw);
return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index fbbb9eb..c961dd4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1024,7 +1024,9 @@ xfs_buf_iodone_work(
bool read = !!(bp->b_flags & XBF_READ);
bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_READ | XBF_WRITE | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
- if (read && bp->b_ops)
+
+ /* only validate buffers that were read without errors */
+ if (read && bp->b_ops && !bp->b_error && (bp->b_flags & XBF_DONE))
bp->b_ops->verify_read(bp);
if (bp->b_iodone)
So your patch is not sufficient to fix the problem, even if dm returns
-EIO instead of -EAGAIN. My question is, what is dm supposed to return?
Regards,
MF
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
