On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:06:01PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:38:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:22:22AM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:47:54PM +0800, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote: > > > > - cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix >$seq.full 2>&1 > > > > + cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix >>$seq.full 2>&1 > > This is quote from the mail, but the merged patch does something else. > > > > +./273: line 95: syntax error near unexpected token `&' > > > +./273: line 95: ` cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix >$seq.full 2>>&1' > > > +umount: /dev/sda9: not mounted > > > that seems rather strange. The patch does this: > > > > ....sub_$_suffix >>$seq.full 2>&1 > > http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfstests.git;a=commitdiff;h=0c5e67e46e476b70290033efc7feb784f7ecbab1;hp=08557e219c12e573be459407033495899f46967a Oh.... > --- > > > and the error output you see is > > > > ....sub_$_suffix >$seq.full 2>>&1 > > > > So it doesn't look lie you are running with the change that is > > actually in the patch... > > There's a difference between the patch in mail and what has been merged, that > can happen, but I wonder why it works on your side. .... because I haven't updated to the latest xfstests master branch yet - I'm running with the patch from the list applied. I didn't realise you were running from the main repo, and that the commit was busted... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
